A proposed curriculum alignment hub: a comprehensive workspace for curriculum
The following post by Learning Equality’s Global Curriculum Specialist, Shivi Chandra, explores how individual efforts to address some of the challenges in adopting OER could become more powerful, receive recognition, and build upon one another through a centralized coordination hub. This is being shared as part of a collaboration with the EdTech Hub and this blog is cross-posted on their site.
How much lesson planning could you do in fifteen minutes?
In my work with OER, I come back to that number often. On a research trip to Rajasthan, India, in 2017, our team at Learning Equality interviewed six teachers at an under-resourced rural school to find that that was the average amount of time they had to select materials for their weekly digital learning class. Our Kolibri Content Library is stocked with varied OERs — games, books, lessons, videos, simulations, and more — but at the end of the day, it wasn’t necessarily relevance, capacity, training, or buy-in that made the difference in whether those materials became part of classroom practice or not. It was just time. Teachers simply did not have enough of it to engage in many of the best practices that we and other capacity-building experts recommend to make use of OER, that is, add assessments, vet the resource beforehand, devise a sequence, and more.
Within a vibrant community of educators, we understand how OER can improve learning outcomes, provide teachers with flexibility, and enable an exciting spirit of collaboration. Yet many educators, particularly in under-resourced school settings, might still choose to use a textbook for the simple reason that, since a textbook is aligned to the curriculum, it caters to what a teacher can do in fifteen minutes.
Curricular alignment and OER: the next big challenge
Unlike textbooks, it’s harder to align an OER collection to a curriculum. When materials are aligned, they’re organized according to their applicability to curricular objectives within a given country curriculum.
That’s especially important for learning management systems, virtual learning environments, and repositories that rely on using digital materials from different sources to fulfill needs met by a textbook — a single source, created by one publisher to the specifications of the official curriculum. But for the educators of today’s world, who facilitate the movement of diverse resources to engage global citizens and meet the diversity of learner needs, one source isn’t enough anymore.
In Learning Equality’s work, when we receive feedback from educators globally about the use of OER or materials in our Library, we hear about the need for an improved understanding of relevance, challenges with discoverability, or the need for additional guidance for lesson planning or assessments to ascertain knowledge acquisition. Alignment addresses such issues as matching the structure, vocabulary, navigation, and assessment mechanisms of diverse materials in a way which saves educators’ time when using these materials.
Proposing a curriculum alignment hub: an initiative to share efforts
What is exciting is that digital alignment work is happening! Hardworking teachers and curriculum institutions align resources they like to their local curriculum, often unpaid, and content providers release their materials aligned to various curricular standards.
These efforts need to be recognized, acknowledged, accessed by implementers of education initiatives and potential funders, and tracked to avoid duplication of work. To share our thinking on this and develop it together with others, we’re collectively proposing the idea of a hub that brings together existing efforts on curricular alignment. The need for this is clear, particularly based on our observations and feedback through curriculum alignment initiatives in Jordan, Kenya, and Uganda, as well as our ongoing work on public goods with NORAD, UNHCR, and Google.org.
A curriculum alignment hub would be a centralized, dynamic hub to coordinate, train, standardize, and share alignment efforts. We suggest four components that each address common challenges:
- A dynamically updated tracker of existing alignment efforts by curriculum and content source.
- An approved, publicly viewable database of professionals qualified to align materials.
- A discussion and announcement area for funding and sponsorship drives for alignment efforts.
- A diverse kit of training materials featuring best practices, downloadable and interoperable templates for sharing, and other onboarding tools.

Aligning and refining: realizing the initiative
At this conceptual stage, what are your thoughts on such a proposed hub?
We already know that teachers can do a lot in fifteen minutes. Our collaboration with EdTech Hub is based on the idea that those of us preparing digital technologies and educational programmes at scale can use our time to save teachers time, and curricular alignment is one high-impact way to do so. We’d love to hear any feedback on the concept note, in particular the structure of a curriculum alignment hub and its usefulness, ideas on which organization is best positioned to head this effort, and expressions of interest in development and / or investment. Anything that we produce as part of this work will always be open and available as a public good, and we want our consultation and ideation process to adhere to that spirit of openness as well.
Reach out with comments to curriculum-collab@learningequality.org. If you are working on a curriculum alignment project using digital resources, let us know!